jump to navigation

Design Is the Problem – Nathan Shedroff April 8, 2012

Posted by Arthur Che in Systems Thinking, Uncategorized.
trackback

Design is the Problem cover

Design Is the Problem: The Future of Design Must Be Sustainable by Nathan Shedroff is a comprehensive account of sustainability in the context of design. Above all, it demonstrates the responsibility designers carry and the opportunity that they have to craft a more sustainable world.

The slightly provocative title reflects a compelling realization that despite good intentions, design has contributed to the unsustainability of the world around us. Designers have often made new things when they weren’t necessary, emphasized low cost over durability, and designed in the name of short-lasting fads, all without sufficiently considering the bigger picture. For example, Shedroff points to the concept of planned obsolescence as an example of complete disregard for sustainability at a strategic level. Shedroff aims to turn this dynamic upside down, and calls for designers to integrate sustainability as a fundamental part of their overall processes. This initial challenge serves as a foundation for the rest of the book.

Shedroff lays out a clear picture of sustainability that clarifies it against vague concepts such as “green” and “eco.” He presents a systems-level perspective that values social and financial implications as much as environmental ones. Designing sustainably is a complex balancing act that requires us to step back, look at different systems, and see how they connect. Of course, this is easier said than done, and Shedroff provides numerous examples where looking at individual products simply isn’t enough. On the surface, paper bags might seem more environmentally friendly than plastic ones because they are biodegradable. However, when you factor in the increased environmental costs of producing and recycling paper bags, along with the significantly higher transportation costs due to weight, the picture becomes much less clear.

From there, Shedroff gives a review of sustainability frameworks, including Natural Capitalism, Cradle to Cradle, Biomimicry, Life Cycle Analysis, the Sustainability Helix, and numerous others. As an aspiring designer with little background in sustainability, I found these summaries extremely useful. Clearly, Shedroff has done his research and chosen a good variety of relevant frameworks from the field. My own work experiences have led me to an arm’s-length understanding that sustainability is important, but I’ve never learned the details and complexities of the topic. The meat of the book is extremely valuable for anyone with a similar lack of experience.

In particular, I was intrigued by the Cradle to Cradle framework (also called “eco-effectiveness”), which espouses a bar for sustainability in which waste actually becomes food for another process. For example, some manufacturing solutions make it possible for factories to output cleaner water than what originally went in. The Biomimicry framework looks at nature (which similarly has no concept of waste – everything is used by something else) as a model for developing better solutions. While the specifics of each individual framework vary quite a bit, together they provide compelling ways to examine societal, environmental, and financial factors and their respective impacts on sustainability as a whole.

DITP032: Figure 3.25

Sustainability frameworks juxtaposed

Shedroff goes on to provide an overview of techniques for increasing sustainability, divided into the categories Reduce (“less is more”), Reuse (increasing durability), Recycle (increasing likelihood of actual recycling, vs. being recyclable), and Restore (making “positive” rather than “zero” impact). As with the frameworks, this section of the book is thorough and well-organized, with excellent examples of each technique throughout.

While some may seem obvious, Shedroff frequently takes concepts a step further. For example, Shedroff uses the iPhone as an example of dematerialization, the idea of reducing materials and energy in our design solutions. Indeed, Apple has clearly stripped materials to the bare minimum from product to packaging, but Shedroff also points out that the iPhone has dematerialized other products entirely by combining the mobile phone with an audio player, PDA, digital camera, GPS device, watch, and e-reader. Integrating these together (and allowing people to have 1 device rather than 7) has an even greater impact on sustainability than the reduced physical materials of the actual iPhone.

DITP039: Figure 5.4

The iPhone - 7 devices in 1

Finally, in the last section of the book, Shedroff lays out a strategic innovation process and discusses how designers can bring sustainability into their organizations. The process is logical and well laid-out, and it reflects many of the ideas we’ve been learning about in class.

DITP068: Figure 16.1

Shedroff's Strategic Innovation Process

The biggest takeaway for me in the process model is the separation (and interdependence) of the corporate strategy and product/service phases. Shedroff convincingly argues that the development of corporate strategy is where sustainable thinking can make the biggest impact. It is during this phase that an organization really decides what it wants to be and how it wants to function. For a sustainable mindset to truly take hold, it must be considered by leadership at the highest strategic levels. I think one issue Shedroff could address further is the challenge of convincing other stakeholders.  Still, the model provides a guide for how sustainability can be addressed, and uses concepts such as diverging/converging and leveraging multi-disciplinary expertise to get there.

Meanwhile, the product/service development phase is critical for executing on the established strategy. Shedroff does a great job of mapping different parts of the process to the frameworks and techniques established earlier in the book, giving designers actionable, useful ways to promote more sustainability into their design processes.

Overall, the book provides a thorough set of tools for designers, but also great value to business people, engineers, and anyone else that wants to make a better future. It presents the issues along with directions on where to look for deeper dives. Most importantly, it paints a broad picture of sustainability as a complex interconnection of systems, and demonstrates how it cannot be ignored.

Resources

About these ads

Comments»

1. shangsong0 - April 8, 2012

Unlike what Shedroff mentioned about iphone, I think iphone is not a good example of sustainability because of its supply chain. Numerous articles have been published online to comment on that issue such as this one http://www.mbaonline.com/cost-of-iphone/

Although this article argues that the development of corporate strategy is where sustainable thinking can make the biggest impact, I think product/service phases is equally important to make sure the ideas coming from the corporate strategy are enforced.

2. Arthur Che - April 8, 2012

Shang-
I think one of the strengths of the book is that Shedroff breaks down the idea of “sustainability” into many composite parts. He uses the iPhone specifically as an example of dematerialization, which is just one of many different techniques/elements of sustainability, not necessarily sustainability as a whole. One of the lessons is that it’s often difficult to say something is “sustainable” or “not sustainable” – there are tradeoffs everywhere.

Overall, the book has a positive tone on Apple products – we should ask him tomorrow what he thinks of the legitimate criticisms in the infographic you linked.

Regarding strategy vs. product/service development – I interpret the emphasis on the strategy side as a reflection of stakeholder realities. One might argue that it’s easier for designers to promote sustainable practices on the product/service development side. Corporate strategy, on the other hand, can be harder for designers to penetrate in many organizations. The book sends a strong message that designers must make their voices heard through the entire process.

3. Nathan - April 9, 2012

Shang and Arthur, Thanks for the comments 9and thanks for the kind review, Arthur).

Apple gets a lot of bad press simply because they’re the most visible and biggest player in their industries. However, I don’t know of any company doing more than Apple nor any that have sustainability at the core of their strategy. They’ve had a bigger net impact on their industries than any other. I’ve written in the past a bit about it on the book’s blog: http://www.rosenfeldmedia.com/books/sustainable-design/blog/how_can_apple_be_sustainable/

In addition, there has been a lot of recent press that suggests that Apple is doing well:

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/american-life-retracts-apple-episode-says-daisey-fabricated-175638428.html (This American Life retracts Apple episode, says Daisey fabricated parts)

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-57406627-501465/fair-labor-association-releases-apple-foxconn-report Fair Labor Association releases Apple, Foxconn report)

I’m happy to talk about this more tonight.

Nathan

4. Marta Karolak - April 9, 2012

Arthur,
Thanks for the review. I’m fascinated by how different this book is than the one I read by Shedroff several weeks ago. The topics in this book, especially the “strategic innovation process” you describe at the end, tie much more directly into the intersection of business management and design. It’s interesting to think of the evolution of Shedroff’s own interests and views on design and to follow that through to his current post as head of the Design MBA program at CCA. I’m looking forward to his visit tonight.
Thanks again,
Marta

5. Matt Chwierut - April 9, 2012

Arthur,

Great and informative review! I wonder if the book discusses life-cycle analysis as a tool for making decisions or mostly for raising awareness. That kind of thinking, while powerful for understanding a system, reaches limits when trying to prescribe alternatives to the status quo, because the entire life cycle of a product or process is subject to too many complex and moving factors: advancing technologies, global markets, consumer preferences, policies at multiple levels. Changing something upstream may have unintended and unforeseeable consequences later in the process. The often-cited example is the increase in sales of black bag liners in Ireland following the ban on plastic bags, because people formerly used the plastic bags for their waste bins. One could argue that ethnography and design thinking could have caught that, but it seems that there is always another factor involved.

So the question is, What framework can we use to think about product life cycles in such a complex environment? Is LFA more of a qualitative tool than a quantitative one? If more of a qualitative one, how is it a convincing input to decision-making in a measurement-drive business environment? That question likely applies to many of the conceptual processes in the book, and perhaps we will discuss it this evening.

Matt

6. Arthur Che - April 9, 2012

Nathan,
Thanks for checking out my post. I should have guessed you would have addressed the Apple topic already on the blog. Very much looking forward to hearing you speak tonight.

Marta,
Definitely – the book really demonstrates that he is coming at innovation and sustainability with both design and business expertise. I’ve met a few folks in the DMBA program (very cool peeps) and they really instill that synthesis of design/business throughout their thinking.

Matt,
For brevity’s sake, I didn’t talk about LCA, but the book does have a good section about it with a nice example of the Toyota Prius vs. the Hummer H2. The impression I came away with was that LCA would, in an ideal world, be a powerful quantitative tool for analyzing sustainability. But as you say, the systems are often so complex that it’s a gargantuan task to collect and link all the data that is needed. The book notes that LCA techniques are improving, but acknowledges that most organizations don’t really have the time/money/expertise/data to use it adequately yet.

I suppose that doesn’t answer the question – but hopefully we can dig more into it tonight.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 58 other followers

%d bloggers like this: